Commonwealth Court Judge Robert Simpson ruled that the controversial voter ID law in Pennsylvania can remain mostly in tact for the November election, but will impose a very narrow injunction that will allow even those without identification to vote. The ruling, which is expected to be appealed to the Supreme Court, targets the portion of the law that deals with provisional ballots.
As written, the law said voters who do not bring proper photo ID on Election Day can cast a provisional ballot. They would then have six days to bring in the required photo ID for their votes to count.
But as he had indicated last week during hearings in the case, Simpson decided that the law does not disenfranchise voters simply because it requires poll workers to ask for photo ID. Rather, the risk comes when a voter casts a provisional ballot but then cannot obtain the necessary identification in time.
As a result, Simpson decided that for the November 6 election only, voters without appropriate photo ID could vote, but would no longer have to produce identification within six days, as their votes would be counted. Source
Latest posts by Janet Shan (see all)
- Nancy Pelosi: Hillary Clinton Can Help Democrats Win Back the House - January 27, 2015
- Blizzard of 2015: CNN’s Don Lemon Ridiculed on Twitter for his #BlizzardMobile - January 27, 2015
- Ex-HP CEO Carly Fiorina: “Unlike Hillary Clinton, I Have Actually Accomplished Something” - January 25, 2015