Germany’s Brown Babies, Products of Post-WWII Interracial Love Affairs, Finally Have a Voice

Germany’s Brown Babies, products of post-WWII love affairs, on quest to find black American fathers are finally being heard in new documentary, “Brown Babies: The Mischlingskinder Story.”

Germany’s brown babies finally getting their place in history. A new documentary, “Brown Babies: The Mischlingskinder Story,” brings to light the struggles of children caught in the middle of the racial tensions in the U.S.A. and Germany as a result of post-World War II love affairs. Thousands of these interracial children of black American soldiers and white German women were shipped out of Germany in the wake of unspeakable racial intolerance. The stories of these children, who were sent to live in black adoptive homes to that they could be “socially accepted” in the U.S., during the height of Jim Crow, is now being told to the world. It is sad that these 5,000 or more “brown babies” had to live for so long without knowing their true identities. The film won the best documentary award at the American Black Film Festival in July.

Because of their heritage, the children faced a troubling amount of racism from both sides of their families.
This was the time of segregation in America, when racist Jim Crow laws kept whites and blacks apart in public places dictating that ‘separate but equal’ facilities be used.

The cultural climate was not much better in Germany, as the mothers stood out with their dark-skinned children in a mostly-white country. Many were called ‘negerhueren’ or negro whores.

There are so many people in our midst who don’t know who they really are or even know their history. It’s sad but a reality we live with every day. During my paternal grandmother’s funeral in 2006, I was stunned to learn there we had some mulatto relatives, who were her first and second cousins. My grandmother, had some of their features, but she was dark-skinned. So, genes and family history are powerful. Bob Marley said it best in his hit song, Buffalo Soldier, “If you know your history, then you know where you’re coming from…” You have to learn about your history to really understand who you are in the grand scheme of things. I am moved by this story, but happy Germany’s brown babies are finally getting that voice and discovering their true identities.

Brown Babies: The Mischlingkinder Story Wins Best Documentary 2011 from Mychal Sligh on Vimeo.

Ford Theatre Says Bill O’Reilly’s New Bestseller “Killing Lincoln,” Riddled with Factual Errors

Bill O’Reilly’s new bestselling book, “Killing Lincoln,” flunked by National Park Service Ford Theatre’s Rae Emerson as being “riddled with factual errors.”

bill oreilly and martin dugard killing lincoln 196x300 Ford Theatre Says Bill OReillys New Bestseller Killing Lincoln, Riddled with Factual Errors

Ford Theatre Says Bill O'Reilly's New Bestseller "Killing Lincoln," Riddled with Factual Errors

Bill O’Reilly’s new bestselling book, “Killing Lincoln: The Shocking Assassination that Changed America Forever,” was recently flunked by Rae Emerson, deputy superintendent for the official National Park Service bookstore at Ford’s Theatre, who recommended that the bestseller not be sold at the historic site ‘because of the lack of documentation and the factual errors within the publication.’ Well, I guess Bill O’Reilly kept his word about not wanting to write another “boring history book,” but one interspersed with fiction, in what the Christian Science Monitor calls a “sensationalized, suggestive, and overly simplistic” tale of Lincoln’s life. In the tradition of Fox News’ long history of twisting the truth.

We received a copy of the audio book from Macmillan Audio in October. We found the book to be interesting, but sensational in its account of what led up to the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. My 10 year old son listened along with me and it piqued his interest but therein lies the problem. I wanted him to learn more about the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and the historical context based on factual information, not half-truths, un-truths and sensationalism. I believe that if a book is on the top of the bestseller’s list and it’s not a work of fiction, then it should be truthful and factual, not riddled with factual errors. If there’s fiction, then I must concede that Bill O’Reilly’s “Killing Lincoln” belongs under the title of fiction.

Here are some factual errors recounted by Bill O’Reilly & Martin Dugard & refuted by Rae Emerson:

Chapter 15

“The two warriors will never meet again.”

Fact comment:

On April 10, 1865 Generals Lee and Grant met a second time at Appomattox Court House, Virginia. At that second meeting General Lee requested that his men be given evidence that they were paroled prisoners – to protect them from arrest or harassment. 28,231 parole passes were issued to Confederates.

Chapter 21, 27, etc.

“Grant meets with Lincoln in the Oval Office.”

“Lincoln sitting in his Oval Office . . .”

Fact comment:

Oval Office built in 1909 during Taft’s administration.

Chapter 39

“Booth’s second act of preparation that afternoon was using a pen knife to carve a very small peephole in the back wall of the state box. Now he looks through the hole to get a better view of the president.”

Fact comment:

“Despite all attempts to prove, without success, that the hole in the door to box 7 was bored by Booth that same afternoon, a recent letter from Frank Ford of New York City (to Olszewski, April 13, 1962) may clarify the fact. In part, his letter states:

As I told you on your visit here in New York, I say again and unequivocally that John Wilkes Booth did not bore the hole in the door leading to the box President Lincoln occupied the night of the assassination, April 14, 1865  . . .

The hole was bored by my father, Harry Clay Ford, or rather on his orders, and was bored for the very simple reason it would allow the guard, on Parker, easy opportunity whenever he so desired to look into the box rather than to open the inner door to check on the presidential party . . .. Source: Salon

It should also be noted that Ellen Fitzpatrick, history professor at the University of New Hampshire,also criticized the book in a Washington Post review, saying, that there was “no credible evidence to support such an assertion” that Secretary of War Edwin Stanton “was involved in the plot to kill Lincoln, in the hope that he might ascend to the presidency.” I’m afraid Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard are the “pinheads” he loves to refer to on the “O’Reilly Factor” on Fox News Channel. It’s quite clear that Bill O’Reilly is no historian and should stick to his day job, instead of trying to confuse 10 years old kids like my son with a sensational account of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. It is a sad commentary that Bill O’Reilly’s book is banned from being sold at the very place where Abraham Lincoln was killed because it is nothing more than a sensational bore. Why am I not surprised that someone from Fox News is twisting the truth again……

pixel Ford Theatre Says Bill OReillys New Bestseller Killing Lincoln, Riddled with Factual Errors